Category: Las Cruces

  • SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT ON EXPUNGEMENT

    By Paul Haidle, Senior Policy Strategist, Policy

    People keep asking me, “Why does the ACLU support expungement?” It’s a fair question. We have a well-deserved reputation as an organization that fights for public access to information related to functions of government. We make frequent use of Freedom of Information Act requests, or IPRA as it is known in New Mexico, to make the case for the better and more efficient use of government. So why did the ACLU of New Mexico work with Representative Antonio “Moe” Maestas this year to draft a bill that would remove certain criminal  records from public view?

    It boils down to this: A criminal record is a fundamentally different type of public record than other documents that allow individuals to assess the credibility and function of government.

    This bill gets at some of the most important tools for fighting recidivism: access to good jobs, safe housing, and educational opportunities.

    Criminal records in this day and age stick with you for life. Even a mere arrest without conviction can have consequences decades after the fact. A felony conviction can create permanent barriers that stand in the way of people’s ability to move on with their lives. These records are a kind of “scarlet letter” that people with convictions carry for life.

    According to the National Employment Law Project, one third of all American adults have a prior arrest or conviction record . Prior to 9/11, certain industries were more accessible to people with criminal records; now the Society of Human Resource Members says 92 percent of its members conduct background checks on some or all of their employees.

    It’s because of this stigma and the loss of opportunity for people with a criminal record that the ACLU not only supports expungement, but views this legislation as a critical tool for increasing public safety. This bill gets at some of the most important tools for fighting recidivism: access to good jobs, safe housing, and educational opportunities.

    Open government advocates and some members of the press have opposed expungement legislation in New Mexico arguing that the public and the press have a right to know about a person’s criminal history. We agree with that position. Nothing in this legislation would limit the press’ ability to report on criminal cases and nothing in the bill requires them to erase stories they have run. Similarly, this bill does not expunge records for law enforcement purposes and sealed court records could be opened by a judge for good cause, like any other sealed record in New Mexico.New Mexico also has one of the highest rates of children with incarcerated parents, a known Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE) factor. By allowing a parent with a criminal record the opportunity to access safe housing and good jobs, this legislation will improve outcomes for many New Mexican children.

    Nothing in this legislation would limit the press’ ability to report on criminal cases and nothing in the bill requires them to erase stories they have run.

    What this bill actually does is allow a person to request to have a publicly available criminal record removed. Depending on the seriousness of the charges, a person will have to wait longer to be eligible to expunge. Certain crimes, such as sex crimes and crimes against children, are never eligible for expungement. A person must petition the court and give notice to the District Attorneys, the Department of Public Safety, and the arresting agency, each of whom are allowed to object to the expungement on public safety or other grounds. The District Attorneys are allowed to notify any victim in the case. Finally, the court must balance whether the expungement petition is “in the interests of justice” by considering the age of the offense, the nature of the offense, evidence of rehabilitation, and reasons why the public should still have access to the record.

    We believe this bill strikes the right balance – it has significant public safety protections while also giving an individual and their family the chance to move forward with their lives.

    Las Vegas Expungement Lawyer

  • Bill to expunge criminal records moves forward in Santa Fe

    ALBUQUERQUE, N.M.- House Bill 370, which would give people the chance to clear their criminal record, is moving forward in the legislature.

    It passed the full House in February and passed its first committee in the Senate Tuesday.

    Rep. Antonio “Moe” Maestas is sponsoring the bill.

    He said it would give people who are convicted of a misdemeanor or non-violent felony the change to have their criminal record erased after they serve their sentence.

    It would also apply to identity theft cases.

    “So, when you’re eligible, you can petition the court, obviously a lot of horrible crimes you’re ineligible, but you can petition the court and take these off court websites and make them unavailable for the public,” Maestas said. “They’re still available to law enforcement and they’re still available if those federal background checks or state required background checks require an extensive background.”

    Depending on the crime, people could face a waiting period before they could petition the court.

    The decision to expunge a person’s record would ultimately be up to a judge.

    Maestas believes it would be easier for someone to find a job or get housing if their criminal record is cleared.

    “If you got arrested in your early 20s, and you’re applying for a big, real job in your 40s, you have to explain it, that’s not who you are,” Maestas said. “Over the course of 10 or 20 years, you can expunge those arrest records which remain on your record and have a fresh start for employment”

    However, Terri Cole, president and CEO of the Greater Albuquerque Chamber of Commerce, said the bill means employers wouldn’t have the full picture of who they’re hiring.

    “The bill would wipe out the criminal histories of not only some non-violent offenders but some serious offenders and that is a big problem for business,” Cole sale.

    She believes an employer should be able to know all the facts about an applicant’s history, including any criminal record.

    “Business has to be able to understand the criminal histories of people they are hiring because those some people will be interacting with their clients, with their employees, with their customers, so they have a right to know who they’re hiring and what those criminal histories look like,” Cole said.

    The bill is now set to be heard in the Senate Judiciary Committee. If it passes, it will head to the Senate floor for a vote.

    Track this bill during the legislative session

    New Mexico Expungement Lawyer

    Albuquerque Expungement Lawyer

     

  • A Chance For Change

    Nine years after his release from prison, Barron Jones has become a leading advocate for criminal justice reform in New Mexico.

    Following several years as a reporter for Española newspaper the Rio Grande Sun, he left for the ACLU of New Mexico in January to lead a project of his own. Now, Jones solicits input about criminal justice reform from people who have felt its effects, including both the formerly incarcerated and victims of crime.

    ACLU-NM’s Campaign for Smart Justice is part of a national effort by the organization to significantly reduce the number of people incarcerated in America, which is the highest in the world and costs about $1 trillion annually when factoring in social costs. Jones agrees that any serious effort at reform must include the perspectives of people who’ve been through the ringer.

    “The goal of the Smart campaign is to pressure [New Mexico] politicians by bringing folks to meetings to say how the system has impacted their lives,” Jones tells SFR. “How families are separated, how they can’t get employment, how their parents are in prison.”

    The ACLU is one group generating ideas for three interim meetings scheduled for mid-July, where two bipartisan legislative committees will discuss various ideas for an omnibus criminal justice reform bill. Some lawmakers believe the departure of Gov. Susana Martinez at the end of year represents the first opportunity in a long while to pass laws that would cut back some of the social costs of incarceration that lead to further imprisonment, and save the state money from not opening new prisons. For example, Martinez vetoed legislation to limit the use of solitary confinement and help former inmates get jobs.

    Rep. Antonio Maestas (D-Albuquerque), who co-chairs the interim Criminal Justice Reform Subcommittee, says the package is possibly the “first ever” major legislation of its kind in the state. It would implement various alternative-to-incarceration ideas like greater investments in diversion and rehabilitation programs for lower-level offenders, and would also address some of the collateral consequences of convictions, like the inability to find work, that lead to more crime and recidivism.

    “I think the big thing we must do is some sort of expungement law to give relief for folks with dings on their criminal history,” Maestas tells SFR by phone. “Once you pay your debt to society, you shouldn’t continually have to come into road blocks.”

    The state’s Sentencing Commission predicts New Mexico’s prison population will steadily increase by 14 percent through 2027. Prison facilities for men and women are already experiencing overcrowding today. New Mexico is also one of 16 states where at least 40 percent of people in state prison were convicted of property or drug offenses. Finding ways to intervene here is key to reform, says Paul Haidle, an attorney at the ACLU who studies consequences of convictions.

    “The answer is going to be either for us to build more prisons, or change how we’re incarcerating people,” Haidle says.

    A major driver of incarceration rates is actually incarceration itself, which hinders people from re-integrating into society in a number of ways. One online database funded partially by the federal Department of Justice lists at least 680 various consequences for a felony conviction in New Mexico.

    Many consequences are specific to licensed careers like law, medicine and nursing, dimming future career prospects. Obtaining things needed to run a business becomes essentially impossible. Other consequences directly affect more people than the convict; for example, the entire household of a person accused of fleeing to avoid felony prosecution or violating probation or parole can become ineligible for food stamps.

    Then there’s the whole social stigma surrounding a conviction, which can’t easily be legislated away. It makes it harder not only to find employment, but housing too.

    Senator Bill O’Neill (D-Albuquerque), an advisory member of the interim Courts, Corrections and Justice Subcommittee, knows this well. Prior to his ongoing stint in the Legislature, he led the Dismas House transitional living program for formerly incarcerated people. In the early 2000s, the organization tried to buy a house for its anchor site in Santa Fe, on Richards Avenue near Walgreens, but NIMBY locals ran them out of town. The house is now in the North Valley of Albuquerque.

    “I think people need to understand that people are coming out of prison anyway,”  O’Neill tells SFR. “Ninety percent of inmates are released. Would you rather have them in supportive residential programs? … I think strongly that an investment in this would pay dividends, [and] it’s borne out in statistics in other states that have gone down this road.”

    Rep. Maestas says many of the provisions that could be included in the omnibus bill come from legislation that had already been passed but vetoed in the past. He’s especially adamant about disallowing the Motor Vehicles Department from suspending licenses for small traffic violations and failure to appear in court.

    “States throughout the country reject [the practice]; we don’t need prosecutors and cops and courts dealing with people who owe 50 bucks,” he says.

    Anybody with other good ideas can show up to the interim meetings at the Roundhouse July 16 through 18, or to a Smart justice program meeting at the Center for Progress and Justice on July 16 with Barron Jones. He especially invites both crime survivors and the accused to show up.

    “I believe folks who have had similar experiences as myself, they’ve fallen through the cracks,” Jones says. “Having their voices help us shape our legislative platform.”

    Support independent journalism by becoming a Friend of the Reporter.

    New Mexico Expungement Lawyer

  • Acquittal in Las Cruces Federal Drug Case

    United States v. Manuel Pavón-Rodríguez

    United States District Court – District of New Mexico – Case No. 2:17-cr-01923-JB-2

       After a four day trial in Las Cruces Federal Court before Judge Robert Brack, a 12-person jury returned with four “not guilty” verdicts as to Manuel Pavón-Rodríguez. His attorney, Stephen D Aarons, explained that Mr. Pavón-Rodríguez had been indicted by the grand jury for possession with intent to distribute 246 pounds (111 kilograms) of illegal drugs. Mr. Pavón-Rodríguez and his co-defendant, John Milne, were arrested near Rodeo New Mexico and the drugs were discovered in five burlap backpacks in the back of Milne’s Ford Explorer. Mr. Milne was represented by two federal public defenders and he was convicted on all counts.

    Mr. Pavón-Rodríguez testified that he had emigrated to New Mexico over 15 years ago and is living in Santa Fe with his wife and four children. He needed to return to his birthplace after the death of h is parents to check up on his two brothers, one of whom has Downs Syndrome. He hired an outfit to return him illegally across the border. Others being transported earned their way by carrying the heavy back packs each loaded with 50-100 pounds of contraband, but Mr. Pavón-Rodríguez had paid a full fare and did not carry any drugs. Although Mr. Pavón-Rodríguez was released after his acquittal by all twelve jurors, it was not clear whether his immigration lawyer could obtain a stay from deportation given his family situation. Without any felony drug conviction, however, he will be eligible to apply in the future to become a permanent resident or naturalized citizen.


    Después de un juicio de cuatro días en el Tribunal Federal de Las Cruces ante el juez Robert Brack, un jurado de 12 personas regresó con cuatro veredictos de “no culpable” en cuanto al Manuel Pavón-Rodríguez. Su abogado, Stephen D Aarons, explicó que el Sr. Pavón-Rodríguez había sido acusado por el gran jurado de posesión con la intención de distribuir 246 libras (111 kilogramos) de drogas ilegales. El Sr. Pavón-Rodríguez y su codemandado, John Milne, fueron arrestados cerca de Rodeo New Mexico y las drogas fueron descubiertas en cinco mochilas de arpillera en la parte trasera del Ford Explorer de Milne. El Sr. Milne estuvo representado por dos defensores públicos federales y fue condenado por todos los cargos.

    El Sr. Pavón-Rodríguez testificó que había emigrado a Nuevo México hace más de 15 años y que vive en Santa Fe con su esposa y cuatro hijos. Tenía que regresar a su lugar de nacimiento después de la muerte de los padres de H para controlar a sus dos hermanos, uno de los cuales tiene el síndrome de Downs. Él contrató un equipo para devolverlo ilegalmente al otro lado de la frontera. Otros que se transportaban ganaban llevándose los pesados ​​mochilas cargadas con 50 a 100 libras de contrabando, pero el Sr. Pavón-Rodríguez había pagado una tarifa completa y no llevaba drogas. Aunque el Sr. Pavón-Rodríguez fue liberado después de su absolución por los doce miembros del jurado, no estaba claro si su abogado de inmigración podría obtener una suspensión de la deportación dada su situación familiar. Sin embargo, sin una condena por delitos graves de drogas, podrá postularse en el futuro para convertirse en residente permanente o ciudadano naturalizado.

     

    Count 1: On or about June 23, 2017, in Hidalgo County, in the District ofNew Mexico, and elsewhere, the defendants, JOHN LEROY MILNE and MANUEL PAVON-RODRIGUEZ, unlawfully, knowingly and intentionally combined, conspired, confederated, agreed, and acted interdependently with each other and with other persons whose names are known and unknown to the Grand Jury to commit an offense defined in 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(l) and (b)(1)(B), specifically, distribution of 100 kilograms and more of marijuana. In violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Verdict: NOT GUILTY

    Count 2: On or about June 23, 2017, in Hidalgo County, in the District of New Mexico, the defendants, JOHN LEROY MILNE and MANUEL PAVON-RODRIGUEZ, unlawfully, knowingly and intentionally possessed with intent to distribute a controlled substance, 100 kilograms and more of a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of marijuana. In violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B), and 18 U.S.C.§ 2. Verdict: NOT GUILTY

  • Federal Case Dismissed

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff,

    vs.

    No. CR 10-3093 JB

    MARIO DAVID DI FRANCO,
    Defendant.

    ORDER DISMISSING INDICTMENT

        THIS MATTER came before the Court on the written motion of the United States, for an Order dismissing the Indictment as to defendant. Being fully advised in the premises, the Court finds that the motion is well taken and should be granted;

    IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Indictment in this cause be and hereby is dismissed without prejudice as to Defendant MARIO DAVID DI FRANCO.

    IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall provide two certified copies of this order to the United States Marshal as authority to proceed hereunder.

      /s/ Judge Browning

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE